441

Summary

The “Rogansphere,” a sprawling ecosystem of podcasts and online shows led by figures like Joe Rogan, has become a powerful cultural force for younger audiences, functioning as a “Fox News for the young.”

With its mix of anti-establishment rhetoric, distrust of Democrats, and casual conversations blending left-leaning and conservative ideas, it normalizes figures like Donald Trump for a disillusioned, lonely audience—particularly young men.

Democrats risk underestimating its influence, as this ecosystem fosters deep listener loyalty and has contributed to a significant shift in young male voters toward Trump.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Yes because insulting the voter base is the way to win their votes. This is why we keep fucking losing. Instead of adjusting we call the voters lonely and stupid. Sounds like a sure fire way to win on the fence voters.

This article is essentially saying anyone that listens to these shows is the problem.

[-] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Tbf, anyone listening to Joe Rogan is stupid.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago

I listen to Joe Rogan

[-] NastyNative@mander.xyz 10 points 2 days ago

They killed their chance with Sanders who had a better approval rate than Hillary and could have won that election. Thats when i realized the democratic party is GARBAGE.

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

For me it was when they skipped their primary election, then adopted the slogan “Democracy is on the ballot”.

Like damn that is insulting. I’ve voted Democrat in every election in my life until this one, but I will not put up with gaslighting from anyone no matter how long our history.

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago

This article is essentially saying anyone that listens to these shows is the problem.

Fascists are usually the problem, yea

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee -1 points 2 days ago

Now you seem to be implying that anyone who listens to podcasts is a fascist.

Do you ever just take a breath and hold off on what you’re about to say?

[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Now you seem to be implying that anyone who listens to podcasts is a fascist.

No, I'm not, learn to read

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago
[-] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

I wasn't ambiguous at all, learn to read

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee -2 points 2 days ago

This, many people who voted for Trump weren't going to vote at all until Hillary called them deplorable.

[-] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

She didn't. If they weren't voting for trump she didn't call them deplorable. Also, she was referring to only a subset of trump voters. She said you could separate trump supporters into two groups, one was a basket of deplorables. They seem fine with "murderers rapist and thieves and some I assume are good people ", but "there are neo nazis supporting this man, we need to reach the non nei nazis on his side" is too far.

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago

Regardless, the rhetoric is aggressive and alienating, the opposite of what a candidate who wants votes should be.

[-] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I would agree that it was aggressive and alienating. Another issue is that it was extremely easy to take out of context, which it widely has been. It's so it of context that people who didn't know the context proudly labeled themselves as "deplorable" showing solidarity with David Duke. Never realizing that's who the original context was about. But it's hard to speak in a way that will never be taken out of context. "You didn't build that" for another example.

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Did Hilary ever actually clear up the ambiguity though or did we have to give her the benefit of the doubt to a degree?

I dont quite understand what she had to gain from making the statement even if it was said different. She had a strange way of carrying herself thats for sure.

[-] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basket_of_deplorables

There wasn't ambiguity to clear up in context, but she did regret saying "half" of his supporters. She was clearly never saying all of them. Unless you remove the context.

[-] droporain@lemmynsfw.com -4 points 2 days ago

Lol you aren't ever going to win that voter base, the fact that you keep trying is why you keep losing.

[-] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Quit your bullshit. Dems have never gone after this segment and you know it. What the fuck is wrong with you?

[-] droporain@lemmynsfw.com -1 points 2 days ago

Yeah this thinking right here is what won you that election.

[-] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

You need to go to bed. You're not making sense.

[-] droporain@lemmynsfw.com 0 points 1 day ago

Riddle me this what is making sense to you in the country currently

You're a bad faith actor. I would never give you the sincerity of real engagement. You would take it as an opportunity to spread your poison. You're not a Riddler.

[-] droporain@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 day ago

YoUr tHe pOisoNer. Better to drink what's bitter and accept the truth then dance like a fool for clowns.

[-] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

You think you're giving medicine.
You're not.

You're an asshole and you enjoy it.
Grow up.

I'm done with you.
Write your response. It won't mean anything to me.

[-] droporain@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 8 hours ago

What are you even talking about? Good luck I hope you find a meaningful path.

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
441 points (97.2% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2274 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS