this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2025
162 points (98.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

13320 readers
389 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Every time I read this my heart breaks for the families. Of course the driver was in his seventies. Of course the police will never question if he took meds forbidding him to operate heavy machinery.

Edit: took it down. Did not see someone fast faster than I I

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rocky1138@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Bollards should be required anywhere people have to be around cars.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Honestly. Sidewalk curbs shouldnt be 6" high they should be 24" high and reinforced with rebar.

[–] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 days ago

Or just ensure people actually know how to drive when they get their license and especially more frequently test older folks whose reaction times and vision may have deteriorated significantly. That'd be a lot cheaper and more feasible than redeveloping entire cities. Deal with the problem itself at its root.

[–] PedestrianError@towns.gay 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

@Pyr_Pressure @rocky1138 That would lead to a lot more broken ankles and other more serious injuries for people walking, not to mention making it a lot more challenging to make sidewalks ADA accessible.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

???

I have a hard time imagining how it would lead to more broken ankles.

A 6" curb is easier to mistep on then a 24" high wall that someone has to climb over.

Not to mention, most areas that sidewalk curbs are located are in areas where pedestrians aren't going to be crossing.

Obviously you would leave a 48"-60" gap in the tall curb in areas that you are actually meant to access / walk through like crosswalks.

[–] PedestrianError@towns.gay 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

@Pyr_Pressure Are you talking about a curb or a wall between the street & the sidewalk? Regardless, people don't cross exclusively at crosswalks, people who park along the street need to get onto the sidewalk, etc. Turning sidewalks into fortresses would be highly inefficient and have a lot of unintended consequences. We need more limits on where and how fast cars can go and safety features like automatic braking to prevent crashes, not to rearrange the whole built environment for cars again.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago

Obviously it wouldn't be a one size fits all locations situation

If there's parking nearby use bollards.

If it's a road way with vehicles driving parallel to a sidewalk instead of a 6" tall curb make it a concrete wall instead 24" high with gaps where crosswalks are located.