933
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by loulis@lemmy.world to c/leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Delusional@lemmy.world 79 points 1 year ago

More and more it seems like people just don't want to help pay for services that are extremely helpful. Yet when those services are removed, they get all uppity about it. It's just like brexit. Stupidity on a massive scale.

[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago

Because it's extremely easy to convince people to make conservative decisions, but they have to actually be paying some level of conscious attention to get behind progressive ideas.

[-] notatoad@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

people really hate being warned about the consequences of their actions.

"you can do whatever you want, and we'll make sure nothing bad happens to you" will never not win votes.

[-] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Sometimes the cost of not funding the thing is higher than the costs of funding it

[-] rentar42@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

Not just sometimes. That's the norm. It's why we decided to fund stuff with public money in the first place: it's cheaper than not doing it.

[-] demlet@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It's the result of deliberate dumbing down of the voters. Can't have the plebs actually voting for their interests.

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They don't want to pay for programs they don't benefit from and even those they only want to hamper enough that they get theirs but no one else does.

this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
933 points (98.2% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

3330 readers
764 users here now

Rules:

Also feel free to check out !leopardsatemyface@lemm.ee (also active).

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS