this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
388 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

32121 readers
39 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Unity: We have to charge for every install because we only see totals. Also Unity: We can tell which install is which, so you won't be overcharged.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 161 points 2 years ago (6 children)

The whole thing seems rushed because the CEO of Unity, John Riccitiello, was the leading advocate of microtransactions when he was at EA, and now he is instilling the same culture at Unity.

How will they differentiate between pirated copies and legitimate copies? How will they distinguish first-time installs from repeat installs? Can we trust their algorithm? It just doesn't seem possible.

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 112 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Unity: Everyone really seems to hate EA

Also Unity: Let's hire the CEO of EA

🀦

[–] Ertebolle@kbin.social 88 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It may have been more like:

Unity: "We love money and hate our customers, who can we hire to realize that vision?"

EA CEO: "Finally, a job that understands me"

[–] ech@lemm.ee 49 points 2 years ago

Unity: ~~Everyone really seems to hate EA~~EA sure is making a lot of money

Also Unity: Let's hire the CEO of EA

🀦

Ftfy

[–] peter@feddit.uk 69 points 2 years ago

If there was a foolproof way of checking for a pirated copy they wouldn't be making a game engine they'd be making DRM

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm not sure why they hired him.

"Hey we're looking for a new captain, why don't we go for the guy who repeatedly sails into rocks? He'll be good."

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Unfortunately a story as old as Wall Street. CEOs designed and hired to kill companies are a thing.

[–] iso@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Meaning that this is on purpose? If so, who would profit from this? (besides the incompetent CEO themselves)

[–] omeara4pheonix@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Short sellers, and the corporation that absorbs them at bargain prices.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 years ago

Key bit feels like "can we trust their algorithm"

It's hard to enforce a "just trust me, this is what you owe"

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 21 points 2 years ago (9 children)

You can usually tell a unique machine apart from another via MAC address, but even that has issues, and that's giving Unity the benefit of the doubt when they haven't earned it.

[–] Silvus@kbin.social 39 points 2 years ago

If I buy a new computer, they shouldn't be charged again because I installed on the new machine.

his is ignoring the "we don't collect personal data" but "we will definitely know if you install it once or multiple times "we have ways""

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 35 points 2 years ago (2 children)

MAC addresses are per network Interface, my computer has three technically and uses two of them on a regular basis.

A terrible tracking method.

[–] Dyf_Tfh@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 2 years ago

And nowadays you have randomized MAC addresses on IPV6.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 2 years ago (3 children)

MAC addresses are absolutely trivial to spoof, to the point that it's just a drop-down option on linux lmao, so yeah good luck with that one

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] wim@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Except iOS will randomize its mac adress at each boot / after a while to prevent users being tracked by rogue WiFi networks, which is actually a thing being used to track consumers in commercial spaces etc. So that wouldn't work.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 5 points 2 years ago

So did Windows at one point at least.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Platform27@lemmy.ml 57 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Lying about collecting that data, because they do (and I block it). Not lying, but backtracking on everything else.

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 39 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're right, they're absolutely collecting data, but saying they can't differentiate between activations and then saying "oh yeah, actually, we can when it comes to (piracy/bundles/charity/etc.)" less than 24 hours later tells me that not only do they not care about game devs, but they think we're stupid too.

[–] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 13 points 2 years ago

It also tells me that this is the first time their internal devs have heard about these plans. This is the C-levelβ€˜s wet dream, not something they have actually implemented yet.

But hey, it can’t be that hard, can it? The code monkeys should be able to get it to work in three months, right?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dom@lemmy.ca 47 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Ok so if they are now only charging for the first install, why aren't they just charging an extra fee per sale? Wouldn't that accomplish effectively the same thing? (And actually work out in unity favour since not everyone who buys a game downloads it)

[–] Veraxus@kbin.social 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Because they realize that a huge number of their customers are small indies, and they want to be able to squeeze them - the majority of their customer base - not just the minority of big companies (who are also the most likely to fight back legally).

Just look at how their scheme squeezes smaller, poorer developers way more than big ones. If Unity went by points like, say Epic does with Unreal, they could shake down the big developers… but wouldn’t get much out of the indies.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 14 points 2 years ago

Which is the opposite of what smart companies like Adobe do. You facilitate the small players in hope that they grow big and keep using your products at a larger scale.

[–] dudewitbow@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It work for paid games, youd have to apply it to microtransaction level if by f2p game, which is the real target for the change.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] recycledbits@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Was Unity lying yesterday or are they lying today?

Yes and yes. It's not an either-or situation.

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 10 points 2 years ago

Good point, they can't both be true...but they CAN both be false. I'm hiring you as my lawyer.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ellabella@beehaw.org 25 points 2 years ago

The fact that they went forward with this decision means they're not so wise at lying. It sounds more like last-minute damage control, but I doubt this will stop their greed. What I'm wondering now is how will the Chinese game companies react? Everybody get your popcorns ready.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 25 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So does this mean every single unity game will have unity online drm now? Or how else will they be able to tell? Seem so much more convenient to take a cut from sales instead

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crossmr@kbin.social 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is wizards of the cost all over again. Unity learned nothing from them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wirrvogel@feddit.de 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sounds trustworthy to me! ~/s~

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ecksell@lemmy.one 14 points 2 years ago

Relevant username is relevant

[–] decivex@pawb.social 12 points 2 years ago

What does 'install' mean here anyway? Most unity games I play are either distributed as archives or installed through third party launchers.

[–] SnowBunting@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

So what is a better game engine to use now?

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Unreal for "commercial, highly documented, also an industry standard"

Godot for "this is actually libre software and you can trust it to not enshittify itself in a couple years"

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 4 points 2 years ago

This is the perfect answer.

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 years ago

Godot is FOSS.

Unreal is decent too i guess but.. not free. (Though iirc its free if you publish your game on epic)

[–] archchan@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί