556
Well, Mr Christie, Trump is a symptom of the kind of party you've been a part of for decades. These people and their anger against the truth are the culmination of everything your party stands for.
Got a friend from NJ. The vitriol she spews at this guy...
What's that say about the republican party if the most rational sounding presidential candidate is this piece of shit?
I'm amazed Christie can be as popular as he is even.
He was really well-liked in his first term as NJ governor, but the shit he did in the last year or two is stuff so stupid and assholish we all assumed it meant he felt that he was never going to be in politics again.
load more comments
(1 replies)
"Deplorable" would have also been acceptable.
Whole fuckin basket of em.
Boatloads.
There's a swift boat joke in here somewhere, but I'm not savvy enough to make it.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I really want to dislike Christie, I really do. However, he is the only Republican that is saying truth to power.
I know I will be flooded with whataboutism retorts. (or I would have if this was Reddit)
Hey now, you can still dislike him, it's ok. This is a total "Heartbreaking: The Worst Person You Know Just Made A Great Point" situation. He's still the worst (well, one of many), he just happens to be right about this particular thing.
Excellent perspective
load more comments
(1 replies)
It's crazy that we're so far through the looking glass that he's the good guy in the GOP.
just because he's calling out assholes, doesn't mean he's not an asshole.
Christie isn't a good guy. he's just in a different faction of bad guys.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I will agree with you only inasmuch as that we agree to define good on a relative scale
I thought saying "in the GOP" made it pretty clear we were grading on a curve.
As of about a year ago he still wouldn't say "No" regarding whether Trump would get his vote if nominated, when directly asked.
He also helped put Trump in power.
So, yeah.
I don't think whataboutism is required to argue with someone having a hard time disliking Christie, unless you define whataboutism in some interesting and unusual way.
At best he's realized they need to try stuffing the monster back in the box, after he helped bust it open.
Here’s the thing: he only does it sometimes, never when it matters, and only ever for self-serving reasons. So think twice before you shower Christie with too much praise; he doesn’t deserve it.
Here’s the thing: he only does it sometimes, never when it matters, and only ever for self-serving reasons.
I would argue that he's doing it right now at a time when it really does matter (Trump is running for president) and there's not much in it for him (he's not going to be the GOP nominee).
He's not the only one, but they are few. Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger come to mind.
load more comments
(1 replies)
Christie is right, of course. Nearly eight years too late of course, since he helped create the monster.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/01/us/politics/chris-christie-donald-trump.html
Been awhile since I listened to a Bill Maher podcast, but I'm 99% sure it was only about a year ago he still refused to say "No" when Maher asked him repeatedly if he'd vote for Trump if Trump got the nomination.
Unless he's done a very solid about face since then, he'll put the monster right back in there if Trump runs.
"We don't want things solved! We want the problems to hurt everyone else but us! We will be ok because we have beans in the basement!"
We want the problems to hurt everyone else but us!
"We want problems that will hurt every else more than us!"
Remember the good old days when Chris Christie was the most reprehensible republican.
Setting records for least popular governor in the US at the time
Remember the good old days when Bush was the worst president of all time?
load more comments
(1 replies)
They may not be booing for the right reason, but Christie has earned a lifetime of boos.
They would be very upset if they understood what the word, "reprehensible" meant!
From the "facts not feels" and "fuck your feelings" crowd.
Fuck, we're felons.
After his speech, Christie was approached by far-right activist Laura Loomer, who was criticizing Christie for his comments against Trump and for “supporting the weaponization of government.”
“The proudest moments of my career is to be opposed like someone like you,” Christie said to her.
LOL
I actually just visited his website because it's been a minute since I paid any attention to what policies he supports. Welp, there is zero information about his policy support on his website. "The Truth Matters" yet I'm uninterested in establishing a record of those truths.
You reap what you sow.
Back in 2009 Christie torpedoed a long planned New York / New Jersey tunnel project, because he didn't want Obama to get credit. The money was already earmarked, so it got spent somewhere else. Screwed his own people out of jobs and infrastructure to make points with the extreme Right.
Now he's shocked that the wolves he fed are still hungry.
leopards ate his face.
Finally one guy is coming kinda close to saying what all Republicans should have been saying since 2016, and it's somehow news. Christie and MAGA can both go get fucked, you're way too late and many dollars short to suddenly rebrand as the principled one you angry tub of mayo.
angry tub of mayo
Chef's kiss to that one
Hey hey hey. You leave Chris Christie alone. Poor guy can't even go to the beach without upstart marine biologists trying to push him back into the water.
All he’s has to do is close the beach, just like he did last time.
Or any major bridge to the beach. Oof.
christie is irredeemable but acting as rat trump fucker is delightful
The republicans are so insane that majmke someone as him seen sane.
Republican Party’s Freedom Summit event
Every time I see him now...
"Think about the time we bought you an ice cream and a cookie. Rented that Lambo so we could go buy milk when we played hooky. That was our ride, we rode it around, yeah momma it was good, til we hit that boy in the pink golf shirt with the pepper spray tan and he laid down on the concrete."
"anger against the truth" also known as fucking cowardice
Republican candidates being fully confronted by how awful their constituency is.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Between jeers, the former New Jersey governor tried to tell the crowd of Trump supporters that their energy is better spent elsewhere.
“When you think about the problems that our country and this world is facing, when you think about that, this type of pettiness … is beneath … the process of electing a president,” he said.
“That’s what we should spend our time talking about, and that’s the place where I suggest some of our anger should be directed,” Christie said about the ongoing war between Israel and Hamas.
Christie echoed a similar sentiment to his speech in a post on X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, with a donation link.
Former President Trump headlined the event in Kissimmee, Fla. Christie and the other GOP candidates, including former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley, North Dakota Gov.
The candidates will return to Florida on Wednesday, where they will participate in the third GOP primary debate in Miami.
The original article contains 454 words, the summary contains 158 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
He's sooooooooo close...!
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2023
556 points (98.6% liked)
politics
19120 readers
2275 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS