Maybe the Saudi investors who own him have finally called in the favor and told him it's time to put an end to the EV transition...
Other manufacturers should have stuck with CCS.
Why? NACS is a lot better. It's not owned by Tesla, other charging networks will be using it and replacing CCS with NACS as well
Some hits from the current round of shareholder voting:
Well that's embarrassing
Yes Elmo, I'm sure that will solve your problems. Well done.
Maybe I skimmed that too quickly, but it looks like this is just the execs on top of those departments, not the people working within them.
It's kinda buried:
All of which makes the decision to get rid of senior director of EV charging Rebecca Tinucci—along with her entire team—a bit of a head-scratcher.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The Information reports that last night, the company's erratic CEO Elon Musk emailed workers with the news that he has dismissed a key pair of executives—one responsible for the Supercharger network, and the other head of new vehicle development.
The electric car maker posted its quarterly results last week and they paint a poor picture, with shrinking sales and plummeting profit margins.
While Tesla once had a strong first-mover advantage and benefited from Musk's marketing savvy, the company has frequently ignored the many hard-learned lessons of the auto industry.
Many Tesla fans had been holding out hope that Musk would debut a cheap Model 2 EV in recent weeks.
Instead, the tycoon promised that robotaxis would save the business, even as both of its partially automated driver assistance systems face recalls and investigations here in the US and in China.
Musk also told staff that he would ask for the resignation of any executive "who retains more than three people who don't obviously pass the excellent, necessary and trustworthy test."
The original article contains 503 words, the summary contains 170 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
