arrow74

joined 2 months ago
[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 hours ago

Also some people no matter how intelligent just can't fully grasp a new language. They can become functionally fluent but never academically perfect

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 9 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

You can spend 200 years listening to a language, but if you don't try to understand it you never will

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

My city owns all our utilities. Works the same, arguably more reliable

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 days ago (4 children)

This isn't a choice issue. It should be state owned and operated in a non-profit capacity, and everyone should pay their fair share.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Correct. So that means the incentive would obviously be placed on higher value crops and not necessarily staple crops like rice.

That's a big problem for a nation's food security

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

If we don't invent some insane technology in the next 10 years there's pretty much nothing we can do.

Best case enough people die, environmental impacts decrease, and the climate stabilizes.

Worse case we become another Venus.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Makes a lot of sense to try and preserve the remaining 40% then

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 9 points 3 days ago

Huge news for diabetes, but I'm more excited about the potential applications this type of treatment has. So many possibilities

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

~~Children~~ Combatants in Iraq

There now it's legal

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 days ago (6 children)

At the cost of their domestic food security.

Did we not learn from the pandemic?

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Back at the office:

So it seems people don't like ads on their vibrator which means they are viewing them. Let's wait a couple of years for the anger to die down then do it again.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I believe you misread, they said a high number of males with evidence of trauma. Basically a very large percentage of male skeletons showed damage. The original comment didn't say there were no female skeletons.

Also depending on the dig site mass graves of men killed in combat are common. Those would obviously lack women.

view more: next ›