WHO SAID THAT?!
What's draconian is that girls and women have to deal with this type of abuse and have people like you wave it off like it's not a big deal, because boys will be boys.
Where did I state that? That's just a strawman. That I don't think one should ruin a very young and potentially immature person's life doesn't mean I don't think that behavior should be addressed. But please enlighten me how expelling someone makes that person a better member of the society?
Just for you: He is 13 (in words: thirteen).
But demanding draconian punishments is always easy of course.
Give a warning and expell the boy for the AI image instead. That does a hell of a lot more damage than a light smacking.
If the story is true it would be overly excessive for both to be expelled. Also the boy who seems to be 13 years old as well. That's just very young. But then again I'm from the socialist paradise Germany where we don't think it's appropriate to throw kids into prison or ruin their lifes otherwise :)
War on drugs just working so well.
How doesn't get that more upvotes?
Your body produces cholesterol. That's why editing the corresponding genes work.
Noch präziser: Das Gebäudeenergiegesetz der aus dem Kabinet Merkel IV, das durch die sog. Ampel angepasst wurde...
Immer wieder spannend zu sehen, welche Diskursmacht die Bild hat. Diese wird von der Axel Springer SE verlegt. Diese wiederum gehört zu 95 % Döpfner und Friede Sringer. Zwei Personen. Gut, dass das kein aus der Politik gesteuerter Staatsfunk ist, wie die öffentlich rechtlichen Rundfunkanstalten :-)
Müsste man wohl.
Am geilsten ist das Argument, dass das alte Wappen sich nicht für TikTok und Insta eignen würde. Gut zu wissen, wo die Prioritäten liegen 😅
Jesus is right. Not surprisingly.
Hell