1236
submitted 1 week ago by ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net to c/memes@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago

Positive reinforcement is the act of adding either a reward for good behavour or a punishment for bad behavior.

It seems like both of you are doing that.

[-] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's not quite what positive reinforcement is but im not sciency enough to understand it either lol
I'll paste Wikipedias explanation:

In the behavioral sciences, the terms "positive" and "negative" refer when used in their strict technical sense to the nature of the action performed by the conditioner rather than to the responding operant's evaluation of that action and its consequence(s). "Positive" actions are those that add a factor, be it pleasant or unpleasant, to the environment, whereas "negative" actions are those that remove or withhold from the environment a factor of either type. In turn, the strict sense of "reinforcement" refers only to reward-based conditioning; the introduction of unpleasant factors and the removal or withholding of pleasant factors are instead referred to as "punishment", which when used in its strict sense thus stands in contradistinction to "reinforcement". Thus, "positive reinforcement" refers to the addition of a pleasant factor, "positive punishment" refers to the addition of an unpleasant factor, "negative reinforcement" refers to the removal or withholding of an unpleasant factor, and "negative punishment" refers to the removal or withholding of a pleasant factor.

This usage is at odds with some non-technical usages of the four term combinations, especially in the case of the term "negative reinforcement", which is often used to denote what technical parlance would describe as "positive punishment" in that the non-technical usage interprets "reinforcement" as subsuming both reward and punishment and "negative" as referring to the responding operant's evaluation of the factor being introduced. By contrast, technical parlance would use the term "negative reinforcement" to describe encouragement of a given behavior by creating a scenario in which an unpleasant factor is or will be present but engaging in the behavior results in either escaping from that factor or preventing its occurrence, as in Martin Seligman’s experiment involving dogs learning to avoid electric shocks.

(These paragraphs are one after the other but I can't figure out proper formatting)

[-] Muehe@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

If you mean formatting as one quote, you are missing the > on the empty line.

> Line 1
>
> Line 2

Will show as:

Line 1

Line 2

[-] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago
[-] Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

Interesting. I've never made that distinction between reinforcement and punishment.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Positive punishment is different from positive reinforcement. Shame is a punishment

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Adding a shame or punishment is “positive” in the sense of the words positive and negative reinforcement.

Positive is adding to as a response:

  • yelling at
  • giving a thing
  • shocking them when exhibiting a behavior

Negative is removing from as a response

  • taking a thing
  • removing a negative stimulus
  • no longer shocking them for exhibiting the behavior
[-] oascany@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Punishment for bad behaviour is negative reinforcement.

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In a non-technical sense, yes.

In a clinical/technical/literal/how words work sense, no.

[-] oascany@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Just looked into this, and yeah, you're right. TIL. It's pretty counterintuitive imo and I don't think being told it's wrong from a "how words work sense" is helping anyone, but you are correct and I was incorrect.

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

negative reinforcement is what punishment for undesired behavior is called.

positive reinforcement is rewarding when the desired behavior is exhibited.

edit: negative reinforcement requires forever conditioning and develops sick and twisted conditioners eventually. positive reinforcement takes longer to work but it doesn't require forever conditioning. And rarely causes revolutionary acts.

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Negative reinforcement is removing a thing when a behavior is exhibited.

[-] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

Negative reinforcement is punishing for doing it rewarding for not doing

Positive reinforcement is rewarding for doing or punishing for not doing

I don't think the person who started this was talking precisely though as positive reinforcement isn't at all effective in getting someone to stop doing something

this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
1236 points (98.7% liked)

solarpunk memes

3004 readers
231 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS