this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
252 points (99.6% liked)

politics

21419 readers
4588 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 17 points 3 days ago (3 children)

As someone that grew up in one of the richest counties in his red state, the public schools were well funded with reasonable class sizes. The system continues to be one of the highest ranked in the nation.

They also didn't allow a JROTC program.

I wonder why it was so important for the county that this be the case, compared to everywhere else in state?

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

As someone who lives in one of the richest counties in a red state, they’ve already gutted the education system so there is no longer a difference between counties.

That state is Texas.

  • The state claimed all our school funding would be solved by introducing a state lottery. It didn’t do a damned thing. Funding is worse than ever. Oh, but lobbyists have started running commercials for casino gambling with the same promise.
  • The state confiscates and redistributes school taxes.
  • Austin takes in a huge amount of tax revenue, but can’t afford to pay its teachers because the taxes are confiscated and sent to the state.
  • The state gives Austin’s tax money to other school districts so they can build water parks and sports stadiums.
  • What doesn’t get redistributed gets confiscated and held by the state in a “rainy day” fund that never gets spent.
  • Not satisfied with this, the state wants to create a voucher program where tax money will be spent on private schools instead. Those vouchers won’t be spent on teachers or students though. It goes to administrators, and the pockets of investors.

https://www.texastribune.org/2023/03/13/texas-budget-surplus/

https://abc13.com/texas-water-park-school-la-joya-isd-funding/4162905/

https://www.texastribune.org/2025/03/06/valere-public-schools-superintendent-salary-texas

And they consistently mislead voters about the effect of vouchers. If attendance in a public school drops, so does their funding. Period. End of story. Maybe the public school budget will stay the same or even increase but public school funding won't go anywhere but down.

The math is bullshit. Even if they said, "Schools keep 20% of the original funding," that's something like an $8000 loss. Do they save $8000 in transportation, building maintenance, lunches, books, materials, salaries, and extracurriculars because ONE student left?

The one positive thing I have to say about my state is that it hasn't gone full Texas... Yet.

The divide at that point becomes a class one, where the quality varies intensely by how rich each individual town is.

The pain comes when a struggling town can barely fund its own schools and the assistance coming from the top down to keep the lights on gets cut.

[–] ToadOfHypnosis@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

Sounds like Carmel, IN.