28
submitted 1 year ago by j4k3@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml

What are the broader implications when it comes to access, security, vulnerabilities, etc?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] segfault@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

coreboot isn't a UEFI implementation. It is comparable to the UEFI SEC+PEI phases. It then hands off control to a payload. If you want UEFI, that's going to still be edk2.

[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What is a typical real world application for tianocore/edk2? Like who is using this and where/why? Like is this for custom hardware projects, servers, hardware hackers, OEMs?

[-] segfault@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

All UEFI system firmware uses edk2. It's not just the reference implementation; Pragmatically, it's the only implementation. Independent BIOS vendors (IBVs) like AMI, Phoenix, and Insyde have built all their tooling for and around edk2. Companies like System76 and Purism use it as a UEFI payload for their coreboot based firmware.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
28 points (96.7% liked)

Linux

48033 readers
765 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS