None of what you said is supported by either the screenshot itself or anything else that's been cited by the OP (or anyone else in this thread). Even calling it "statistical data about the US debt" is overselling it since it's literally just a screenshot and a link to a paper that (presumably?) the screenshot came from.

Anything you mentioned would be interesting to talk about, perhaps with sources? Interviews? Anything? But no; instead we're being told that the screenshot is sufficient context to ground any assertion we care to make.

My point is the post is vacuous and any discussion around it unmoored from anything objective or of interest.