Has anyone tried booster to replace mkinitcpio? (lemmy.ml)

submitted 9 months ago by Certainity45@lemmy.ml to c/archlinux@lemmy.ml

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Does this give any real world value for boot times or anything else?

I have no possibility to test this in VM so that's why I'm asking if anybody has actually tried this and found benefits.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] EddyBot@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

boot time difference feels like in the realm of margin of error
the biggest difference however is that booster builds the initramfs much much faster while mkinitcpio slows down every kernel upgrade espcially on slower laptop cpus

permalink
fedilink
source

this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024

29 points (100.0% liked)

Arch Linux

7175 readers

2 users here now

The beloved lightweight distro

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml