1034

submitted 9 months ago by Gork@lemm.ee to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

92 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] FakeGreekGirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 9 months ago

That's what gets me too. Like, you want to replace all writers, artists, coders, and decision makers... with this?

[-] smotherlove@sh.itjust.works 4 points 9 months ago

Unfortunately it will probably be way smarter than the smartest humans in no time... I just hope my death is painless when I'm conscripted to fight in the water wars after the US aqueducts are depleted

[-] Krauerking@lemy.lol 9 points 9 months ago

Uhh... No. Definitely not smarter. It's not thinking just repeating. Maybe more accurate and predictable sure but not smarter.

But it is still gonna replace jobs anyways cause it's way cheaper than people and lets massive tech and hardware companies sell more

[-] smotherlove@sh.itjust.works 5 points 9 months ago

Throughout human history, essentially everyone who has predicted an upper limit for the development of any given technology has been completely wrong. The only people who have been correct are the ones who predicted technology accelerating to unimaginable heights at unimaginable speed.

Guessing an upper limit on AI is like guessing an upper limit on the stock market. Surely a limit exists, but only a fool would think they can call it.