3
The price of ‘sugar free’: are sweeteners as harmless as we thought?
(www.theguardian.com)
Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.
Politics is allowed, but should not be the main focus of the community.
Submissions should be articles of medium length or longer. As in, it should take you 5 minutes or more to read it. Article series’ would also qualify.
Please either submit an archive link, or include it in your summary.
Rules:
TL;DR: The article discusses the rise of artificial sweeteners as alternatives to sugar and their potential health effects. It mentions that while sweeteners promise guilt-free sweetness and are commonly used for weight management and diabetes, recent research questions their benefits. The World Health Organization (WHO) issued draft guidelines stating that consuming a lot of sweeteners could be associated with an increased risk of type 2 diabetes, heart disease, and weight gain. Despite industry claims, the study found that sweeteners aren't metabolically "inert" and may affect blood sugar and the gut microbiome. The article emphasizes that the best approach for health is reducing overall sweetness consumption and eating minimally processed, unsweetened foods. -GPT3