Nah, this is far more simplistic, and really only works convincingly in 2d, with a... lets call it either minimalistic or simplistic art style.

Motion Matching is what makes a lot of Triple A games stand out for their extremely realistic animations.

Think Assassins Creed after I think 2017, or GTA 4, 5 and RDR2, though the rockstar games also include procedural animations reacting to physics. Basically, many high production value third person games use motion matching, though there are still many that dont.

MGS5 and I think Death Stranding do not use motion matching, its all a complex but ultimately static animation tree.

Motion matching starts with a library of anims that you set up in an anim tree, including transitions if you have them, but it procedurally generates transitions based on input, predicted character path, speed, etc.

Heres a vid showcasing motion matching... describing it in text does not really do it justice.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=m-Zwh6dpA6U&pp=ygUYbW90aW9uIG1hdGNoaW5nIHNob3djYXNl

The best way I can describe it in text was that the feet never glide. The feet, and thus legs, to the root pelvis, all actually take all the steps they'd need to say turn 5 degrees, 35 degrees, or 225 degrees.

This is done procedurally, instead of trying to make transition animations for all possible variants of all possible transitions.

Watching this vid and then comparing it to say Counter Strike, you can see that this means that many minor animations of short strides, pivots, sort of trotting to a stop, or turning... all of these things are basically semi procedurally generated so that a character moves much more realistically and far less... video gameily, lol.

If standard animations are a small or large trees of switching from one anim to another depending on input, or things that happen to the character, motion matching is taking that tree and procedurally generating transitions between those anim states.

Thats still oversimplified but Im trying here.

Motion matching works better with more anims in your tree. Theres also tons of very poorly done tutorials showing off motion matching implemented so poorly you can barely tell, but this upcoming korean game does it extremely well such that you can really see the difference.

PS:

I have actually found examples in Godot of bending elements of an animated character to react to physical objects... like being hit by a moving object causing a flinch specific to exactly where and what part of the character was struck.

But it is far more rudimentary than the totality of the Euphoria system.

Nope.

See my other comment for more detail.

Again, summarized, motion matching is a system that builds off of an animation tree with procedurally generated transitions and blends which create a far, far more realistic fidelity of animation quality then standard anim trees allow.