505

A former Twitter employee, Gary Rooney, won about $600,000 for unfair dismissal after Twitter assumed he resigned by not responding to Elon Musk's "hardcore" work email.

The case highlighted the importance of clear communication between employers and employees, especially regarding significant changes in employment terms.

Rooney’s private Slack messages, where he discussed leaving, were used as evidence by Twitter, underscoring that internal communication on platforms like Slack is not always private and can be used in legal disputes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago

I don't think that's true. We archive all email within the company as soon as it arrives. This is done to prevent an employee from deleting any evidence for many reasons that they may have. We are also on litigation hold which requires all data to be saved and since we can't trust everyone to do this we are required to back up everything until we are told not to. We have used restored data many times for legal cases in the past.

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Where I work there is a data retention policy, and emails and other forms of communication (internal emails and slack, but even customer calls, etc) are deleted after a set amount of time, which varies depending on the rationale for storing that data.

There's many reasons to do this - limit disclosure issues in case of litigation, reduce storage costs, comply with PII rules around the world, etc. The guys in Legal have us file these loong ass forms about all this, including where the data is kept, security measures, etc etc etc.

I'm shocked this isn't common practice everywhere.

[-] Silic0n_Alph4@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

There are two main types of data retention policy:

  • Retain everything to protect the company when the staff do something dodgy.
  • Delete everything to protect management when management do something dodgy.

It’s a little more nuanced than that, of course, but in broad strokes that’s how I’ve seen it play out. Does the company want to pin the blame on somebody or shrug and say “we have no idea how that can have happened, guess we need to forget about it.”

[-] parrhesia@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 months ago

I think that's an understandable position but IT is ruled in a cost benefit analysis for many small to medium sized businesses, so I am sure if it's as common practice there

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

No he's actually right, it's a SOX thing. Not all companies do it but big ones with good legal departments generally do. Especially if they're into shady s***.

The concept rules like this: we delete all emails over 90 days old. If someone subpoena's emails over 90 days old we simply say they don't exist we delete emails over 90 days old and show them the policy. From there it gets a little more dicey if people cram stuff into local stores.

From a corporate standpoint there's a strong advantage to deleting all of your old emails and not keeping backups over 90 days especially for anything that might be legally questionable.

That said with the advent of SAAS, there's a hell of a lot of data out there that doesn't ever go away even if you do your best to make it happen.

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
505 points (98.8% liked)

News

23287 readers
3795 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS