268
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Teachers will be forced to tell parents that their child is questioning their gender even if the young person objects under new guidance for schools in England, the equalities minister has indicated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago

who said anything about therapists? Teachers are servants for the tax payers.

Therapists have a commitment to confidentiality in almost all circumstances.

[-] psysop@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Perhaps therapist was the wrong word. Many schools have health officers who act as emotional support staff that work with students.

I believe all educators have a duty to the well-being of the student ovet the parents. Students are people too, not a thing that parents own until they turn 18. They should be afforded confidentiality too.

[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Perhaps therapist was the wrong word. Many schools have health officers who act as emotional support staff that work with students.

If their job ethically requires a non disclosure factor, than that's more reasonable.

But even doctors, that have privacy requirements, have to share medical information with the kids guardians.

I believe all educators have a duty to the well-being of the student ovet the parents

I think this is a difference between how you see the teacher parent relationship and how I do.

I imagine you believe teachers should be nurturers of these kids and help facilitate their growth as human beings.

I see them as government agents, that are paid (and therefore should serve) by the taxpayers. The fact that taxpayers can overwhelmingly say they want/don't want something, and schools override them is the exact opposite of what I believe the role of public school educators should be. Responsible for teaching the basics of what we think important topics are for kids - generally math, sciences, social studies and literature.

Students are people too, not a thing that parents own until they turn 18.

If my 10 YO kid throws a rock at a window and payment is needed to replace it, who's responsible to pay for it?

Will the law go after his teacher? Go after him? No. They go after me. I'm responsible for them, and it seems that teachers want to nurture them, but take no responsibility if there's repercussions.

They should be afforded confidentiality too.

In everything? You don't think there's any scenario's which a teacher should tell the parents what their kids are doing at school?

[-] psysop@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Hey sorry, I really wasn't looking for a long argument here, just wanted to clarify my earlier comment.

But yes, we have different viewpoints. I have kids. I would feel responsible for the window because it's my kid and that's reasonable and what society expects. If my kid wanted to talk to their teacher about something in private I'm ok with that.

They obviously won't share literally everything, but if my kids have a problem trusting me then I'm failing as a parent.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

Are they not there to serve their students, or do they only serve the parents?

[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

They're government employees, paid by tax payers to educate their kids.

Yes, they're the ones being served, and the government and their employees have lost sight of that.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago

Well, at least you're honest about thinking children don't deserve to have anyone in power looking out for their interests when they conflict with their parents'.

[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

children don’t deserve to have anyone in power looking out for their interests when they conflict with their parents’.

As I've said plenty of times, I'm for an increase in investment in programs to help youth that have these problems.

I'm against having teachers unilaterally determining that they should keep secrets with their students over providing transparency with the parents. With the taxpayers. With the people they are meant to serve.

Do you think our government should give us transparency, or not?

[-] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

People are forgetting the existence of ideologically motivated teachers. I don't understand it.

[-] MasterObee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Even if it's not individual teachers, it's a government ran institution that they force us to provide our kids to for education. The least they could do is let us know what's going on in those 8 hours a day they take our kids.

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
268 points (94.7% liked)

News

22890 readers
6370 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS