-7
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Have you paid attention to popular opinion of Israel these past 3 months? Since, you know, they started a genocide?

Alright, first, this isn't even close to the start. This is just another flare-up of the ongoing genocide that's been apparent to anyone who pays attention to foreign affairs (ie not most Americans).

Second, US popular opinion is nowhere near turned against Israel yet. Even amongst Democrats it's an even split.

[-] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip 0 points 11 months ago

Yeah there certainly are a lot of people with strong opinions about Israel and Palestine that haven't so much as taken the time to open the Wikipedia page about the conflict. TikTok said it's cool to be pro Palestine so that's good enough for quite a few people.

I'm certainly not supporting Israel's actions currently but man how many people so quickly forgot what hamas did only a few weeks ago. It's like it never happened.

I think you can be anti genocide and anti carpet bombing while also believing strongly that hamas doesn't need to exist anymore and it's members are terrorists that deserve the same treatment that Isis and Al qaeda received.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Hamas leadership isn't in Gaza. How is attacking civilians in Gaza going to wipe out Hamas?

[-] RaincoatsGeorge@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 months ago

Don't interpret me as saying I'm supporting what they are doing currently. I said explicitly I don't. But after an attack like that I'd fully support military action in the area. You're a fucking fool if you think any modern nation would ever accept that and just sit by without responding.

The problem is in what the response is. Is it a prolonged occupation going building by building? Worked out great for the US. Israel and the US should definitely set about the framework of taking out anyone claiming to be hamas leadership outside of the country. Anyone who had a hand in that attack.

Again the response isn't indescriminate carpet bombing, but there must be a response.

Now you tell me what it should be. It's super easy to sit in your tower and pretend like you have all the answers when we both know you're likely full of shit.

I at least can admit what reality is here. As far as I'm concerned anything else is just people spewing bullshit when they have no idea what they're talking about.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Now you tell me what it should be.

It should have been a ceasefire long ago. Netanyahu has set a criterion for victory (wiping out Hamas) that he knows cannot be met by his current means (attacking Gaza). He wants to be able to continue attacking Gaza with no end possible.

And we're funding that with no strings attached.

[-] curiousaur@reddthat.com -2 points 11 months ago

You're correct but this is the first time it's gone viral on tictoc. I'm not sure you're understanding how unelectable Biden is now among the young voters that he needed to turn out in record numbers. He will not win another election now that he's so poisoned.

[-] mcribbs@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

You know, you're not going to get very far in any conversation when you just keep saying "he's unelectable now" over and over.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

You'd think curiousaur would be too busy spending their lottery millions they get from their prognosticative powers to talk to us here on Lemmy.

[-] Adubya@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

All that power and they chose to lord it over us poor Lemmy users.

[-] curiousaur@reddthat.com 0 points 11 months ago

The young people said they didn't want Hillary and look what happened. Keep sleep walking.

this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
-7 points (44.6% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3552 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS