274
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

This isn’t a gun control issue.

[-] makunamatata@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 10 months ago

You are right, it is not a gun control issue, it is a gun culture problem.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)
[-] Custoslibera@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

It’s wild you’re even questioning whether air powered firearms should be treated the same as a rimfire or centre fire firearm.

There are countries where people require a regular firearm license to own an airsoft gun let alone an airgun.

[-] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

In my country Airsoft are completely banned.

[-] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

deleted by creator

[-] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 10 months ago

Isn't it?

Where I live, this would be impossible because you wouldn't be allowed to shoot guns somewhere kids can ride through. That's gun control, and it includes air guns.

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago

What I meant is that this incident didn’t really happen because of some sort of systemic gun control problem. Everyone was being responsible with regards to gun control, it’s just that some kids made a dumb decision and some parents weren’t around to intervene. It doesn’t matter how robust your gun control laws are; there will always be some tragedies. I’m all for stricter gun control laws in the U.S., but that’s not going to result in zero gun fatalities. I sin ppl y honk it’s worthwhile to accept it when shit happens despite everyone doing reasonable things to prevent it and not blaming every gun death on gun laws.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Everyone was being responsible with regards to gun control, it’s just that some kids made a dumb decision and some parents weren’t around to intervene.

Um, "everyone was being responsible" and "parents weren't around" are exclusionary statements. It's impossible to be both with guns (even air guns).

[-] lennybird@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Except you prove the point.

  • Everyone was being responsible.
  • If gun control was incorporated, responsible people wouldn't have guns at this moment in time. (many irresponsible people wouldn't either by the laws of supply & demand but that's beside the point here)
  • Thus, the child would be alive.
[-] Sasha@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 10 months ago

I think you could argue that any gun incident isn't the result of a "systemic gun control problem," gun control just prevents things. It's a little confusing to say, but a lack of gun control isn't a root cause of gun problems, it's just a solution to them (and an objectively good one imo).

While I understand your point, and think it's fair, I'd add that a part of gun control is the proper education of gun owners such that they have the thought patterns necessary to consider these sorts of possibilities, and to take action to prevent them. It's a big part of the system here, obtaining a gun licence involves training that fundamentally alters your view of responsible gun use.

That said, I'm not going to pretend that gun control would have prevented this, but it should reduce its likelihood.

[-] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 0 points 10 months ago

Oh weird I thought a child was murdered with a gun

this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
274 points (97.9% liked)

News

23265 readers
3107 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS