499
Microplastics found in every human placenta tested in study
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
499 points (98.8% liked)
News
23275 readers
3436 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
And ipads in every kids hand, given by inattentive parents, actively robbing them of "developing literacy" time.
Kids are supposed to be able to read prior to coming to elementary school. It's expected, with minimal classroom time, by 1st grade, they're reading full blown books. That's fallen by the wayside.
"Kids are dumb because iPads, they should be reading instead."
Ah yes, sorry I forgot you cannot read anything on an iPad. Ever since Apple outlawed reading back in 1997, we've been on a downhill slide to unga bunga caveman times.
I see your point, an iPad is a tool like any other, but FWIW, I ain’t never seen a little kid read on an iPad for fun. Arguably a parenting problem, but also kids games are juiced to the max.
Can't blame the technology itself for the lack of oversight from parents. Put a lock on the games, limit play time, or better yet give your kids a monthly allowance for an e-reader app. Make them excited to read.
Why can't you blame the technology as well? It's quite literally designed to be a trivial but addicting experience. Good parents can obviously circumvent the issue, but on a societal level it's inevitable that millions of kids end up glued to electronic devices at a critical time when they should be developing other skills.
you ever seen a kid read a book when they have YouTube or TikTok as options
Sounds like the parental controls aren't being used properly, more than it being the fault of technology.
At its root, this is a social problem. When people make barely enough money to subsist they don't really rate "developing literacy time" very high on their hierarchy of needs.
It's more than just telling parents "work less and read to your child," especially if there's nothing to fall back on to pay for child care that's impossible to find for even those unburdened by poverty, or paying half of every check to rent, or the enormous rising cost of groceries.
When it comes down to the most brass of tacks, any parent would find it patronizing as fuck to be told they are failing their children because they have to work themselves to death instead of having the luxury of free time. And, of course, they understand that.
Strong social safety nets and support are what we need anyway, whether or not we're parents.
It's anecdotal, but plenty of kids are reading in my kid's first grade class.
He reads at a 4th-grade level which I attribute partly to reading and vocabulary apps.
When I was a kid, I could read pretty well by that age but it definitely wasn't the norm.
Either way, pretty sure you're basing this on what you feel is true, and not actual data. Have any?