64
submitted 1 day ago by solo@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

More lobbyists for the controversial technology were present this year, despite debate about its viability

At least 480 lobbyists working on carbon capture and storage (CCS) have been granted access to the UN climate summit, known as Cop29, the Guardian can reveal.

That is five more CCS lobbyists than were present at last year’s climate talks, despite the overall number of participants shrinking significantly from about 85,000 to about 70,000.

CCS lobbyists at Cop29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, outnumber the core national delegations from powerful nations including the US and Canada. Nearly half of the lobbyists were granted access as members of national delegations, affording them greater access to negotiations, including 55 who were invited as “guests” by the Azerbaijani government,

On Friday, it was revealed that 1,773 coal, oil, and gas lobbyists have been granted access to the climate talks, including 132 invited by the host country, as the Guardian reported.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Viri4thus@feddit.org 16 points 1 day ago

Carbon capture has to be the stupidest climate action to ever hit humanity. It's, and I'm not being hyperbolic, completely and utterly useless. We already have a faster, more efficient, nature borne carbon capture, it's called trees. Maybe instead of watering down the deforestation law in Europe, the MEPs should have thought of that.

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

It's a con, supported largely by the same companies who have already been committing ecocide.

[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Carbon capture is useful for making aviation fuel, and hopefully eventually plastic. But I'm guessing these people were suggesting carbon capture from polluting power plants?

this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
64 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5243 readers
190 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS