Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6449 readers
345 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

The paper is here

2
 
 

The paper is here

3
4
 
 

The Wall Street Journal has a great example: how 5-minute charging is going into Chinese-made cars, but not US-made ones

Access options:

5
6
7
 
 

"Some want to regulate every form of energy besides the so-called renewables, completely out of existence... We oppose these harmful and dangerous policies. This is not energy security,” Tommy Joyce, US Acting Assistant Secretary of Energy for International Affairs, told the conference.

8
9
10
11
12
13
 
 

A huge 89% majority of the world’s people want stronger action to fight the climate crisis but feel they are trapped in a self-fulfilling “spiral of silence” because they mistakenly believe they are in a minority, research suggests.

Making people aware that their pro-climate view is, in fact, by far the majority could unlock a social tipping point and push leaders into the climate action so urgently needed, experts say.

The data comes from a global survey that interviewed 130,000 people across 125 countries and found 89% thought their national government “should do more to fight global warming”.

The existence of a silent climate majority across the planet is supported by several separate analyses. Other studies demonstrate a clear global appetite for action, from citizens of rich nations strongly supporting financial support for poorer vulnerable countries and even those in petrostates backing a phase-out of coal, oil and gas. A decades-long campaign of misinformation by the fossil fuel industry is a key reason the climate majority has been suppressed, researchers said.

Prof Teodora Boneva, at the University of Bonn, Germany, who was part of the team behind the 125-nation survey, said: “The world is united in its judgment about climate change and the need to act. Our results suggest a concerted effort to correct these misperceptions could be powerful intervention, yielding large, positive effects.”

https://archive.ph/hR3ws

14
15
16
17
 
 

Comic story by Eleri Harris

18
 
 

Interior Department officials are considering scaling back the boundaries of national monuments in the West to encourage energy development on public lands.

Access options:

19
20
 
 

Amid tariff threats from the US, energy and economic security are key issues in Canada's federal election.

21
22
 
 

Climate researchers argue their science has advanced enough to directly link emissions from particular companies to damages from specific extreme weather events

“Many of the barriers to these cases are not scientific but political or legal,”

There is no guarantee a court would accept the details of this methodology either, says Myles Allen at the University of Oxford, who proposed more than 20 years ago that climate science may eventually make it possible to sue emitters for damages. “Will the courts accept evidence of a statistical link between annual mean temperature and the impacts of extreme heat, as presented in this study, when it comes to attributing causes of the harm done by a specific heatwave? Some may.”

23
24
25
view more: next ›