353
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PeachMan@lemmy.world 98 points 1 year ago
[-] PinkPanther@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago

This is brilliant! Soon, we might have 14ft.io as well.

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 10 points 1 year ago

I'm gonna hold out for 69ft.io

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ArtikBanana@lemmy.dbzer0.com 95 points 1 year ago

Bypass Paywalls extension for Firefox.
Works better and for more sites in my experience.

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How do I install it on Firefox android, though?

My phone won't open xpi files and the only solutions I've been able to find is either create a html file in the same folder, which I don't know how to do on android, or download and install an extension which is ALSO only available as an xpi 🤦

[-] mister_newbie@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 year ago
[-] Throbbing_Banjo@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

That worked! Awesome, thanks, I tried a few other methods last week with no luck

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 year ago

Yay, that works! Thank you!

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Import custom filter

Bypass Paywalls Clean

I think it's this one

https://gitlab.com/magnolia1234/bypass-paywalls-clean-filters

[-] ArtikBanana@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Well I use Fennec for Android from F-Droid, which has the option of using custom collections for addons.
I don't think it's possible yet on "normal" Firefox other than Nightly.

[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, on the advice of someone else itt, I switched to Nightly and that worked 🙂

[-] jadelord@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

You could instead use the Web Archives extension. Works for most common paywalls.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] dmtalon@infosec.pub 80 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It has seemed to work on less and less sites for me recently, to the point that I do not visited it as often as I used to.

But that tweet does sound like pretty bad news...

[-] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 1 year ago

It never ever seemed to work for me.

[-] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

by the time it got popular, it was already not working with multiple big sources.

[-] cheerjoy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

The only time I ever used it, they told me they chose not to support that site

[-] nomadic@lemmy.one 45 points 1 year ago

https://archive.md/ gets around way more paywalls. Highly recommend it.

[-] nicman24@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

disabling js does more

[-] BelieveRevolt@hexbear.net 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

12ft.io was performative useless garbage anyway, if any site can just ask your paywalling bypass site to not bypass their paywall, what is the point of your site

[-] TheGreenGolem@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Exactly. As soon as they bent over to NYT, I stopped using them.

[-] empireOfLove@lemmy.one 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It stopped working on any of the sites I ever bothered to use it on anyway- most of them wisened up to the crawler bypass and simply made a 2 sentence tagline visible to crawlers that hit the SEO terms, with everything else hidden. Soooo nothing of value lost and Capital comes to claim its pie once again.

[-] tun@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

I used to use 12ft.io whenever I needed to read a paywalled article.

Is the "Bypass paywall clean" extension better than 12ft.io?

[-] Otome-chan@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

I use bypass paywalls clean and never see a paywall. so... yes.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 11 points 1 year ago

Some extra context / clarification from the thread re Vercel: they did warn him starting two weeks ago. They’ve stated he has a line open with customer support to get his other projects restored but that hasn’t happened yet.

[-] MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Technically, if one were to disable the JS used for said paywall on a site, they would never see it again. I haven't personally done this but has anyone tried?

[-] Anders429@programming.dev 25 points 1 year ago

Most sites load no content at all if JS is disabled.

[-] Baleine@jlai.lu 7 points 1 year ago

On a majority of sites all of the page's content will be present at least for SSO. And you have the added bonus that they don't ask for cookies etc...

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 year ago

If the website developer is worth their salt, the article contents won't be delivered from the web server until the reader has been authorized. So it doesn't matter how much JS code you disable.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
353 points (97.8% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54420 readers
370 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS