227
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

The conservative chief justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court on Monday told the new liberal majority in a scathing email that they had staged a “coup” and conducted an “illegal experiment” when they voted to weaken her powers and fire the director of state courts.

Chief Justice Annette Ziegler, in two emails obtained by The Associated Press, said that firing and hiring a new state court director was illegal and ordered interim state court director Audrey Skwierawski to stop signing orders without her knowledge or approval.

all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Odelay42@lemmy.world 161 points 1 year ago

Conservatives are working together to normalize the language of sedition ahead of Trump's trails and the election.

They want us to stop paying attention to words like coup.

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 91 points 1 year ago

Every accusation like this is an admission of intent.

[-] Clent@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Not intent.

Mode of operation.

It's what they were doing until the voters got fed up.

So projection of sorts.

The right is masters of it.

Keep it in mind when one of them accuses the left of being pedophiles.

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago

The way conservatives choose to use the word coup makes it clear that they don't know what that word means. Given their opposition to education, their lack of literacy is no surprise.

[-] frozengriever@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

It's a deliberate campaign to muddle the meaning of words. Look at what conservatives have done to "fake news" or "woke" to see how they're building a parallel Newspeak language

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 21 points 1 year ago

Ever since I read that book I can't see Fox news prime time as anything other than our "two minutes hate." It's disgusting that it's real.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 23 points 1 year ago

They don't know what a lot of words mean, but in this case I think she's just following the advice of Goebbels and accusing the other side of what she's doing.

[-] JdW@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Of course they do. It's a common and effective propaganda instrument to lessen the effectiveness of the word so people take it less seriously when it's used in the correct context. By underestimating their intelligence and cunning you are actually playing right into their hands.

[-] Chocrates@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I saw a headline on Fox news the other day that said something like "State police drive into greeniac barricade" the other day. I had to look up greeniac but it is a coded term to make climate protestors seem insane. Fuck these propagandists.

[-] StarServal@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

They always do this. They always weaponize words with powerful meanings without understanding or caring about the meanings. They just know the elicit a strong negative emotional response and that’s all they care about.

[-] cynar@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It's worse than that. They both get the advantage of its venomous effect, and dilute its effect in the future. A coup used to be a major thing. Now, the word is thrown around all over the place. It's only if you actually pay attention, you realise that one side is using it legitimately, while the other makes no sense. All most people hear is the newest buzz word insult, and tune it out.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They want to water it down, just like Trump did with "Fake News."

Around the time of the 2016 election, there was lots of coverage around literally-fake news sites targeting voters on social media. So Trump's team adopted the 'Fake News" catchphrase to dilute the term and make people think it was a "both sides" issue.

[-] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 57 points 1 year ago

Man, the republicans really don’t like it when the shoe’s on the other foot, huh.

They seem to believe that the power of elected officials is only vaild when they wield it.

[-] rastilin@kbin.social 55 points 1 year ago

The Democrats should sue over this, you can't have a judge screaming "coup" every time they get outvoted. I'm sure a room full of judges can figure out what kind of law this is breaking, almost certainly there's some kind of "incitement" law on the books.

[-] milkjug@lemmy.wildfyre.dev 42 points 1 year ago

Reading through the reported exchange, it sounds like someone wants to be Queen Bee, but was taken down a peg or two.

Boo hoo.

[-] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

When conservatives take control, this kind of takeover is expected. When Democrats take control and do this, all of a sudden it's an affront to justice and fair play. Fuck that. I hope the chief justice quits in disgust.

[-] jumperalex@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I believe they have failed to recognize the Stare Decisis standard and the implications of the long held decision in Elections v. Consequences.

Fuck them and their gaslighting asses.

[-] TheJims@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

I know you are but what am I?

-Pee Wee Herman voice

[-] proper@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago
[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

"This is nothing short of an unprecedented coup. For 40 years, the role of the Chief Justice has been understood and respected."

Says that lady who literally stole the chief position from her predecessor by changing the rules with checks notes the majority rule she is now decrying.

The irony here is soooo delicious.

No one should respect this clown Ziegler. Obviously partisan and anti democratic hack.

And a bitch.

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I hope people can admit that regardless of which political "side" judges are supporting, a judge allowing their political ideology to influence their decisions is a violation of their station. Judges are supposed to use their knowledge, expertise, and experience to rule on how our existing laws should be enforced, based on their original intent, sometimes in the context of circumstances their original authors didn't take into account. Obviously, the influence of one's political inclinations cannot be completely eliminated, but I feel like we've reached a point where judges—particularly those in our highest courts—are abusing their positions of power to advance their own political views. Sometimes, old laws do not make room for new circumstances, and new laws must be passed by legislative bodies instead of simply reinterpreting old laws for the convenience of modern times.

If our judges don't hold to these limitations and instead allow their political views to dictate their rulings, legal precedent ceases to have any meaning, and our laws will become nothing more than pendulums, the meaning of which will always depend on the justices in power at the time. This is not what the founders of our government intended and is no basis for a stable legal system regardless of their intent. This has to stop. If it continues, our legal system is steadily going to lose more and more credibility, and that is a surefire road to the disintegration of society into anarchy and war. This is exactly what our national enemies want.

[-] Pattern@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Historically this is nothing new. Looking at SCOTUS alone, the Marshall court, the Taney court, and the Warren court are all examples of moments where the courts have moved jurisprudence in substantial ways based on ideology. You want justices that, for the most part, will exercise restraint and seek to interpret laws in good faith. I agree with that. But I think it’s important to know that courts have been ideological since the very beginning.

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Fair point, which is why i conceded true ideological impartiality was impossible. Idk, maybe it's just me, but I'm 41 years old and I feel like partisanship in high courts in the U.S. has gotten much worse in the past decade or so.

[-] awwwyissss@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

This is exactly what our national enemies want.

Divide and conquer on steroids because of social media and LLMs.

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Parliamentary style rules for courts were always ridiculous and weakened trust in the judicial system, but they were ridiculous when she was elected chief justice in the first fucking place.

this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
227 points (99.1% liked)

News

23274 readers
3201 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS