DarkWinterNights
Since he subcontracts all his thinking and none of his talking out of both sides of his mouth, I would assume someone somewhere must hire some at least half-competent analytics guy before it all becomes distorted through their cronyist chain of command.
I really wish we had done more - when we realized they were bipolar during the first presidency, we had ~8 years to do more.
At the onset they were still 70% trade partner, with a target end of this year to drop it to 50%.
We should diversify more, and even when we all collectively get 4-8 years of increased stability back from the Americans, we should never fully revert back; it's not a problem they're going to be able to fit, especially when they take the Department of Education and eliminate it as waste.
Except the can of pop is every can of pop that has ever existed.
Confirmed already; $1-5M lunch buy-ins with corporate execs per head - the topic? Tariff exemptions.
Who cares about billions and trillions of wealth destruction of the public coffers when he can make millions per day personally?
PC versus CP - at least one is demonstrably less malicious, but I'm inclined to agree this isn't bullish for the future.
God speed. Hopefully if/when you can wrest control back your country can do something to bring sanity back to American politics, since it's just bad for everyone.
Short of 2 decades and doubling the education budget, not sure what your options are though; going to be hard to undo all the international and reputational harm that'll come out of it, even with the promise of 4-8 years of at least not outright malicious policy.
Good use of graffiti frankly, especially when contrasted with most of the other graffiti we've been seeing.
The main takeaway: The centralized role of coordinating a wide breadth of media organizations and incrementally corralling them towards one narrative, something essentially unique in the space no one else has, and with total lack of transparency, is the biggest distinction between them and everyone else.
Really talking about (American) Chatham Asset Management and PostMedia (a subsidiary), that own almost 80-90% of print media (written news and periodicals, including almost all rural papers and online content). Even now, most people I speak to barely know about either, and it's reach is way beyond the listed periodicals.
Is this as big a deal as it sounds? Kind of. Because the CEO determined they were "insufficiently conservative", he appointed Kevin Libin to coordinate all of the organizations under their umbrella to provide "reliably conservative media." Consider what that phrase even means - it's not perspective, it's an introduction of bias. This isn't something that really exists anywhere else in Canadian News ecosystem, even in the far right, and is one part of the media ecosystem's challenges.
However, they also get the benefit of being "center" between lunatics like Rebel News and True North and the CBC; this gives both them and further right rags more legitimacy than earned by virtue of the total absence of a Canadian far left media ecosystem, hence the attacks on the CBC itself (which does contain editorial, but is general one of the most fact based and investigative journalism driven media organizations in Canada). It also allows them to "create a consensus" by essentially just agreeing with themselves.
Even the Toronto Star, one of the "most left" credible independent media organizations, is now under (separate) conservative ownership.
Frankly, if you're a subsidiary, you should be forced to wear every one of your ownership's emblem "Chatham/PostMedia presents" in double font every time you throw up your Vancouver Sun or Calgary Herald.
You don't have to like or dislike any of these organizations, but the total lack of transparency while structuring this discussion as central consensus is about as disingenuous as you can get.
Things like Ground News (factuality and partisan bias news screeners) help somewhat, but require some literacy in terms of statistics and data. It's worth learning tools like these (or tracking it yourself across everything you read, and looking at a wide berth of the various perspectives in Canada, which is extremely laborious especially in an age where we can barely get people to click past headlines, hence the specific name drop for Ground News which does a lot of this for people).
Privacy focused browsers can help (but don't fully resolve). Not to redo the work of others, copy/pasta:
What makes fingerprinting a threat to online privacy? It is pretty simple. First, there is no need to ask for permissions to collect all this information. Any script running in your browser can silently build a fingerprint of your device without you even knowing about it. Second, if one attribute of your browser fingerprint is unique or if the combination of several attributes is unique, your device can be identified and tracked online. In that case, no need for a cookie with an ID in it, the fingerprint is enough.
A couple of useful articles:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Device_fingerprint
https://blog.torproject.org/browser-fingerprinting-introduction-and-challenges-ahead/ (Excerpt above)
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2022/3363335
There's also a number of interviews with white and red hat hackers who delve quite deeply into the subject and how they've used this telemetry to go after black hats (mainly to emphasize that even with some degree of sophistication this can be difficult to evade, especially when compounded with other methods and telemetry already modelled against your identity).
Sure, it's absolutely valid that Trump has massively helped Liberals in the polls.
It's also true that the Conservatives attempt to emulate Trump's populist rhetoric also blew up in a post Trump victory, as they themselves drew the comparisons.