[-] SHamblingSHapes@lemmy.one 24 points 11 months ago

The Passion of the Christ. I was very confused that people thought it was a good film. And in my specific case, confused about why my school thought it was a good idea to take a bunch of minors to see a very gory R-rated film. That was the most violent movie I had seen up to that point. The whole experience was surreal, and not in a good way.

[-] SHamblingSHapes@lemmy.one 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Body wash and long hair shampoo plus conditioner takes me 10 minutes, full shaving routine takes me another 10. Yes, I listen to music through a bluetooth speaker. Yes, the quality is what one would expect from an inexpensive speaker the size of a soda can.

No, I don't blare music when people are sleeping.

I benefit from it as much as I do from listening to music at any other time? It's entertainment.

[-] SHamblingSHapes@lemmy.one 28 points 11 months ago

I didn't even read the whole thing, TBH. It's been a while, I'll have to see if I still have access via the link he sent me. That's even more blatantly sleezy than I was thinking. If he actually managed to build any sort of following, they might be interested to see what he attempts to put in his NDAs.

Gross. Well today is a "losing hope in humanity" kind of day.

[-] SHamblingSHapes@lemmy.one 25 points 1 year ago

to see unity and cohesion [in] the Lemmy-verse

Pass. It's a a feature, not a bug.

Instead of one community becoming completely dominant on a topic, there's another one close on its heels should anything happen to the first.

And if I subscribe to both, who cares which a particular post comes from? Just scroll down the feed, read a post if it looks interesting, ignore if it doesn't. Which community it originates from doesn't matter.

I wonder if the people who push for one community per topic across all the Fediverse are just extreme tidiness types who get a kick out of seeing everything in orderly little boxes. Trying to Marie Kondo a decentralized internet forum, that way lies madness.

[-] SHamblingSHapes@lemmy.one 25 points 1 year ago

Lol, jail time. You're funny. It was called a low-level misdemeanor. $500 fine and he went about his merry way.

[-] SHamblingSHapes@lemmy.one 23 points 1 year ago

Digital microscopes are very affordable. Basic models up to 1000x can be found for 50 USD.

Break one up and look at the different layers under magnification.

[-] SHamblingSHapes@lemmy.one 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Aka baby teeth or primary teeth or deciduous teeth

[-] SHamblingSHapes@lemmy.one 26 points 1 year ago

One brother doesn't share or give up decision making well. The roles are intended to be project manager rather than dictator; the person is still expected to solicit opinions and delegate tasks to others. He gets frustrated really quickly when he doesn't get his way entirely and will get to a point where he doesn't hear other people's perfectly reasonable views.

But it's been this way forever, it's his personality. He knows it. A few of us are pretty good at calling attention to his behavior in a way that he doesn't feel attacked by and he'll chill out. One just goes toe to toe more aggressively with him and that tactic works sometimes too.

[-] SHamblingSHapes@lemmy.one 29 points 1 year ago

I never understood reddit as a dating site. And the problems there are only amplified on Lemmy.

  1. user density in the geographic region I would date within. With reddit, at least I was quite sure there were other users within an hours drive of me

  2. it's not a dating site and not set up with the guardrails needed to make it even marginally safe. If a person on Bumble starts being scary, there are some ways to report then and they will possibly be removed or restricted from the platform. On reddit and Lemmy, the responses will be one of the following "free speech, get wrecked", "if you don't want to be abused/harassed, you shouldn't go into public spaces", or "you signed up for the site, you asked for it", or "give them a chance, they are probably just not good at dating skills" or even Andrew Tate acolyte bullshit that I don't want to think about.

  3. distribution of gender and of sexual orientation across the platform. I would be surprised if Lemmy userbase is less than 95% men. Unless those men are gay/bi at an improbably high rate, there aren't going to be many people available to match with.

  4. "everyone have a good time, we're here for love" says the hordes of people who are actually here to waste time with no intention to actually date, cruise for nudes, or to data mine peoples personal information.

Tl;Dr if actual dating apps are not bringing a person dating success, nothing about Lemmy will be any better.

[-] SHamblingSHapes@lemmy.one 28 points 1 year ago

Full remote.

I actually like going into the office ~2x per week. But tell me I have to and bump it to 4 days, I'm out. I also do not want my colleagues forced on site. My current ~2x/week is as productive as it is because the other people going on site now are there voluntarily and for specific reasons.

[-] SHamblingSHapes@lemmy.one 31 points 1 year ago

If anyone were to ask me what I think about manhood, I would assume they were a Trump voter. Don't do this.

[-] SHamblingSHapes@lemmy.one 25 points 1 year ago

Sounds like a rally call to hit the bars. "Queer up, boys, we're going out!"

view more: ‹ prev next ›

SHamblingSHapes

joined 1 year ago