xye

I think this is a fair question, I’ve thought some on it. It really is about the nuclear option for decorum. If the ones remaining speak out now that’s Pandora’s box. I would argue it’s far, far beyond that - but if they still believe the system can be “saved” then I think they’ll hold the line. If they did I think it would be as a group and only if it was dire.

Income inequality in whatever the most palatable form is for the target audience who needs to hear it. That’s it. But I’m clearly not convincing you here - I’m just some rando idiot who sees a problem. I would gladly have an adult in the room give a better answer. In lieu of that, this is the best I’ve got for you. I’d love to have a space to discuss these things, I think actionable items like this are missing from current discourse here. Maybe it’s the format idk

Regardless of the outcome I just hope this doesn’t lead to more tribalism in software again. The FOSS community needs to stay strong on an international level whenever it comes to hardware integration etc.

Shockingly stupid. I keep thinking, well that’s the worst, and they are still able to find yet another exploit with which to speedrun fascism.

Pitting STEM vs the humanities is yet another (very successful) issue used to divide us from the real class problems we should tackle together instead. I agree with you.

Yelling at various department managers and threatening to call Musk might work for the agencies they’ve gutted, but yeah fucking with any fire department during an active wildfire…I don’t care who you are, you’re gonna have a bad time. Possibly shovel related.

Yeah that succinctly describes the jank experience I’ve had with it. First, just thank you for all of this. Second, it’s working today, woo! Very stoked about this, again tysm

Ok but this is the problem I think occupy wall street had. They were protesting the right people, getting attention, but consistently the messaging was vaguely gestures the system, Wall Street, bankers. We can speculate why that messaging wasn’t clear or didn’t get out, but we have an opportunity right now to correct that mistake.

Agreed. And I want groups like this to succeed. But we need a single, easily digestible message that can encompass all of these issues under one roof. That issue, imo, is wealth inequality. But now it all comes down to phrasing. It’s an issue that isn’t hard to get people on board with if, and only if, we are careful with messaging and branding. I wish I was joking, but that’s the world we live in. Not the one where I demand everything, get nothing, and keep being frustrated that it never changes. It’s time to adapt or continue the cycle of losing.

Ah, the full Hitler, a bold move let’s see how it plays out.

I couldn’t find that immediately on their site but Wikipedia told me it’s:

• Impeachment of Donald Trump and removal from office[1]
• Investigation into Elon Musk, DOGEand Trump appointees[1]
• Reinstatement of rescinded federal DEI initiatives[1]
• Protection of LGBTQ rights in the United States
• Protection of minorities and minority rights
• Reinstatement of Military aid to Ukraine[2]
• Lifting of tariffs against Canada and Mexico[2]

Which imo is an unrealistic bucket of goals, not a unified call to action

Why would they? Ineffectual protests with disparate, unclear goals. More useful to keep them so there’s at least a harmless resistance to redirect energy toward.