-5
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2024
-5 points (41.4% liked)
Middle East and North Africa
79 readers
1 users here now
Rules:
Rule 0. Comments must be on topic, off topic comments lead to immediate ban. Off topic comments are any comments that will lead to diverging from the post's topic. If you want to discuss something post about it.
Rule 1. No refutation without a source. Any bias against MENA sources could lead to a ban if not backed with evidence. The burden of proof is on you.
Rule 2. This community is first and foremost for people from the region. Foreigners trying to justify military intervention or genocide are not welcomed.
Breaking of these rules may result in a 500-3000 day ban.
founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
AFAIK a lot are there to protect trading ship routes that have been attacked by rebels or so.
Some were probably helping with the makeshift port they wanted to use to supply trapped starving Palestinians.
Dunno who authorized it, but it's also not important, because those ships are cruising around in international waters anyway. They minimize the time docked in ports for strategic reasons. They also get authorization from that nation when entering territorial waters, except if they are in a hostile situation with that nation, of course.
A failed mission so far, and could have been avoided if they stopped the genocide in Gaza. The Yemeni military said so multiple times they will stop if the genocide stops.
Another failed mission and unnecessary. The US could have demanded Israel open up its ports and border crossings for aid. The US could have conditioned the bombs it sends to facilitate the genocide on allowing aid in.
All I see is legitimate non-grata targets, I won't act on it, but others in the region might.
Legitimate targets for what? Who wants to fight the US Navy?
Who! not what, we are people too.
Legitimate targets for anyone with honor and dignity. People normally don't like foreign soldiers strutting around their land or water. I know you wouldn't tolerate Chinese or Russian navies doing the same. Don't expect us to accept what you wouldn't.
Lots do. Even if the means are limited. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Cole_bombing
I think they meant "what" would attacking them accomplish. It just starts a useless fight with nothing to gain.
There is a lot to be gained even if each and every projectile is shot down. It is a war of attrition.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/12/19/missile-drone-pentagon-houthi-attacks-iran-00132480
I don't see how that helps anyone. They both lose; just at different rates.
Would you say the same for Ukrainians fighting Russian forces on their land?
No, because driving a ship somewhere to protect a trading route or build a port is not an invasion. The ships will go away, once the mission is over, but russia wants to stay forever in Ukraine and make it part of russia.
The blockade is on Israeli ships and ships going to ports in Occupied Palestine. It is a response to the genocide in Gaza and therefore justified. The Yemeni forces made it clear they will stop when the genocide and blockade on Gaza stops.
Ships going to Israel bringing food and products are legitimate targets, so are Israeli ships, Palestinians in Gaza can’t even get food, why should genocidal settlers? What the Yemenis are doing is in accordance with international law and every country should do what it can to stop a genocide.
What Yemen has done was successful in bankrupting an Israeli port in Occupied Palestine and causing inflation in the Zionist colony.
Because of US and UK violence, the blockade was expanded to include US and UK ships as well. Totally justified.
The Yemenis have every right to refuse passage to ships associated with genocidal maniacs and their enablers.
My question was for what actions? Do you seriously think you can sink a US warship? At least pretend to be credible when making inane threats.
That said, the last foreign army occupying my homeland was Russian, depending on whether you consider foreign Chinese policemen on your streets a foreign army.
I can't but someone in the region might be able to.
then you should be able to relate instead of ridicule
If someone there managed to sink a US warship, the US will invade and destroy everything in the area in response. That is an escalation no one wants. They're attacking civilian shipping because they can't fight back effectively.
The US destroyed Afghanistan in retaliation for 9/11 and they didn't even have anything to do with it.
The Afghans won and the US left humiliated in the end. Not a bad outcome.
Notice the USS Cole is still there. I guarantee they're still pissed about that. Not the ship you want to target again. They're likely to overreact.
We are betting on their overreaction. The US was defeated in Afghanistan and it can be defeated again.