60
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 19 points 5 days ago

You have to explicitly check if the return value is an error and propagate it. You write the same boilerplate if (err) return err over and over again, which just litters your code.

That’s only true in crappy languages that have no concept of async workflows, monads, effects systems, etc.

Sad to see that an intentionally weak/limited language like Go is now the counterargument for good modeling of errors.

[-] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 4 points 5 days ago

Can you please demonstrate how async workflows and monads resolve this issue?

Wouldn't effect systems still be considered exceptions, but handled differently?

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 8 points 5 days ago

I don't know the answer to your question, but I think that what is needed is just a bit of syntactic sugar, e.g. Rust has ? for returning compatible errors without looking into them. That seems to be powered by Try trait, that may be a monad, but I am not fluent enough to check if it formally is.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
60 points (86.6% liked)

Programming

16984 readers
279 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS