this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
1144 points (99.3% liked)

Firefox

20329 readers
333 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] hunt4peas@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)

Will this also affect IceRaven browser, a fork of Firefox mobile? Also, will it allows us to load extensions locally, like the Bypass Paywall Clean extension?

[–] Knusper@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago (6 children)

IceRaven is a close fork, so it will almost certainly apply to IceRaven, too (maybe with a short delay).

Loading extensions from files, I would not assume to work. Even their current developer workflow requires using an AMO collection.
Someone could reupload Bypass Paywall Clean to AMO. As I understand from quick research, the DMCA takedown request was not challenged by the dev. Or you can use another paywall removal extension.

[–] eco@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You can add the Bypass Paywalls Clean filter lists to uBlock Origin and the user scripts to TamperMonkey to get, as I understand it, almost all the basic functionality of the extension.

[–] hunt4peas@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is there any link I should use to follow to be able to do this?

[–] LollerCorleone@kbin.social -5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] hunt4peas@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why are you downvoted? It's not correct?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)