66
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 0 points 4 days ago

I'm actually surprised there is no specification. It's how I thought languages were written: spec first, implementation later. Do RFCs serve this purpose?

Anti Commercial-AI license

[-] snaggen@programming.dev 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That requires a complete picture and all possible use cases from the start. Initially when a language is new and hardly used there are much to benefit from flexibility and trying new concepts. Then as the language matures, a more formal process is needed to ensure stability. There is a reason these discussions comes now, since rust is in a very stable phase.

[-] taladar@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago

There might also just not be a single spec because the information is spread out over RFCs instead of being collected in a central location.

load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
66 points (94.6% liked)

Rust

5999 readers
17 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits

  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS