this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
302 points (93.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

37070 readers
55 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (7 children)

I've only had to implement equality in C# but that didn't seem that hard of a problem. you just expand the operator = function

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 11 points 7 months ago (4 children)

It's not hard, just if you're doing it for a struct with a lot of fields it's a lot of boilerplate

[–] Deckweiss@lemmy.world -5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

My IDE can do that for me. And it was able to do that pre AI boom. Yes, the code ends up more verbose, but I just collapse it.

So from a modern dev UX perspective, this shouldn't be a major difference.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

Even if the tool works perfectly, you have to run it every time you change something. It's not the end of the world, but it's still much nicer to just have a macro to derive it at compile time.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)