this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2023
359 points (89.8% liked)

World News

36743 readers
412 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] judgeholden@hexbear.net 119 points 2 years ago (96 children)

only fair enough, I remember when they made the US and UK do this after killing hundreds of thousands of people in Iraq

[–] Antikythera@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 years ago (54 children)

You're not wrong, but just because the USA and UK got away with it doesn't mean we should continue to let others get away with it. We can't go back in time and fix it but we've got to start somewhere.

[–] StalinwasaGryffindor@hexbear.net 40 points 2 years ago (17 children)

Why are we letting the people responsible for Iraq and Afghanistans current state get away with it? Like if the US wants to arrest a war criminal Bush and Cheney are right there. Same for Blair, or Harper, or any of the other architects of the invasions.

[–] radiofreeval@hexbear.net 40 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Because bourgeoisie law does three things. Firstly it protects capital against individuals. Secondly it protects itself against individuals so it can maintain "order". Finally, it prevents capital against itself, to prevent it devouring itself in competition or sucking hard enough to create a revolutionary populace. Protecting individuals against each other or against capital is not the purpose of law enforcement, much less protecting people from war criminals. (Btw if anyone can find the parenti lecture this was based off, please tell me because i forget)

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (52 replies)
load more comments (93 replies)