this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2025
374 points (97.7% liked)

Open Source

38745 readers
573 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 55 points 5 months ago (16 children)

FTA: "However, I will say that the social media brigading just makes me not want to have anything at all to do with your approach.

"Because if we have issues in the kernel development model, then social media sure as hell isn't the solution. The same way it sure as hell wasn't the solution to politics.

"Technical patches and discussions matter. Social media brigading - no thank you." -Linus

Yeah, I have to issue an unqualified agreement here. Linus isn't saying no to Rust, he's smackin' that ass for bringing drama out into social media instead of working through it in normal technical discussion channels.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 18 points 5 months ago (15 children)

It sounds like he tried that, and nobody with authority responded until he went outside the list. Even now, Linus hasn't actually answered the question of whether more rust code should be allowed.

[–] aspensmonster@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Martin seems to understand that adding a second language to the kernel is not only a technical concern, but a political one as well. Everyone else wants to pretend politics isn't at play and that their objections are "purely technical." They aren't. I definitely understand Martin's frustration here.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)