172
submitted 1 year ago by pizzaiolo@slrpnk.net to c/energy@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Raz@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago

Yes, because profit is what's so important and not part of creating the problem, right?

Why not use both?

[-] iemgus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Profit is the only real problem with nuclear. The US navy has 7000+ years of operating nuclear reactors without a major incident, and with minimal enviromental impact.

[-] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 2 points 1 year ago

Ok, they are a bit different in scale and construction.

[-] iemgus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's a good point. Having the large scale would afford more room for safety monitoring and control equipment, access for maintenance and operations, and better economies of scale on equipment cost.

Not to mention one plant stays in place on land with unlimited access to support equipment and personal while the other flys though the depths of the ocean, exposed to all its dangers and unpredictability with only the people and equipment that fit onboard.

load more comments (20 replies)
this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
172 points (90.2% liked)

Green Energy

2201 readers
278 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS