this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
35 points (94.9% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

60266 readers
1179 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Looking for a place to find the Windows version of this without paying $20 for a single version or $5/month for regular updates

EDIT: which one of you mad lads did this? https://codeberg.org/WetOtter44/StrawberryMusicPlayer

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pablodaniel 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (22 children)

"Access to macOS and Windows releases are currently restricted to sponsors, a 5 USD monthly sponsorship is required."

Really scummy on their part.

You should be able to build from source yourself to get a Windows version, although the process looks like a pain in the ass.

Curse whoever floated the idea to lock releases behind paywalls. We should not encourage this behavior.

Do not give them your money.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 17 points 2 days ago (5 children)

we also have to pay for a Apple developer account for signed macOS releases

Sounds like you should blame Apple, not the dev.

[–] pablodaniel 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Great point.

Now, are they using this as an excuse to not provide a Windows version?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not specifically. It sounds like they're not really interested in maintaining a Windows version, so for that they charge. Generally I think people should be compensated for their labor, even though that might be an unpopular opinion in this community.

[–] pablodaniel 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

So, why even mention apple if you're going to justify the developer's actions anyways?

I'm going to go back to blaming the devs now. Nice try defending the people taking money from you. They're banking on your low standards.

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

They’re banking on your low standards.

Yeah this is unfortunately common, and many people are quick to defend developers like that making excuses.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)