this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
472 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

72319 readers
2718 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 43 points 1 month ago (16 children)

Misleading statement. It doesn't block "traffic", it blocks DNS requests... you don't know how much traffic this corresponds to.

[–] xavier666@lemm.ee 23 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Correct. The payload of DNS requests is tiny compared to, say requesting a webpage. So there might not be a huge decrease of bandwidth usage reduction. However, having 66.6% less DNS requests is still a win. The router/gateway doesn't have to work that hard because of the dropped requests.

[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 29 points 1 month ago (7 children)

It isn't so much about the payload of the DNS requests, but about the content that would have been loaded if the DNS request hadn't been blocked.

If you load a page that has 100kB of useful information, but 1MB of banner ads and trackers ... you've blocked a lot more than 66%. But if you block 1MB of banner ads on a page that hosts a 200MB video, you've blocked a lot less.

Also a 66% blocked percentage seems very high. I have installed pihole on 2 networks, and I'm seeing 1.7% on my own network, but I do run uBlock on almost everything which catches most stuff before it reaches the pihole, and 25% on the other network.

[–] mac@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I run a handful of instances across different networks, 1.7% is suspiciously low, you should make sure you've got the right lists. I like HageZi's

[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I use firebog's ticked lists, from what I can tell from the logs ad domains are blocked just fine.

But as I said, I have ublock origin on all my browsers which already catches most ads before they reach pihole, and I don't use mobile a lot when I'm at home. Oh, and I also use Linux, so no Microsoft telemetry to block either.

1.7% makes perfect sense to me.

[–] turmacar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I was averaging ~1-2% blocked using the firebog and a few other lists, I also have ublock origin on everything I can. Added hagezi's 'pro plus' list last month and it's up to 39% blocked.

[–] mac@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Yeah no ublock origin really won't block all that many, the chattiest DNS comes from apps and smart devices, windows and mac laptops etc.

I also run ublock on all of my browsers

[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah no ublock origin really won’t block all that many

Meh, it's fairly easy to check this you know. If I turn off uBlock, my pihole logs do turn red. If it's left on, pihole logs stay mostly green, with nothing suspicious or out of the ordinary getting through.

the chattiest DNS comes from apps and smart devices, windows and mac laptops etc.

I don't have many of those. My work laptop is windows but it connects through a VPN only, and I have my smartphone that I barely use at home.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)