this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
65 points (97.1% liked)

worldnews

2243 readers
21 users here now

Welcome! This community is constantly upgrading and is a current work in progress. Please stay tuned.

/c/Worldnews@sh.itjust.works strives for high-quality standards on the latest world events.

The basis of these standards comes from the MBFC, which uses an aggregate of methodologies, including the IFCN and World Freedom Indices, to rate the Bias and Factual Reporting of News.

These are non-profit organisations with full transparency of their funding and structure. Likewise, this community is also transparent – Please feel free to question its staff and the overall content of this community.


Does your post fit the standards? Check this thread!



Rules:


Disallowed submissions

Commenters will receive one public warning with only one strike if violating any of the following rules:

Thank you.

todo list:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I believe this perspective is important before people start commenting from the headline

"For example, the study finds the wealthiest 10% of people – defined as those who earn at least €42,980 (£36,605) per year – contributed seven times more to the rise in monthly heat extremes around the world than the global average."

Point being, this isn't talking about extreme wealth

[–] dumblederp@aussie.zone 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

I'd be interested to see what percentage of damage was being done by the top 1% of wealth.

load more comments (3 replies)