this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
54 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

2796 readers
162 users here now

All things related to technology hardware, with a focus on computing hardware.


Rules (Click to Expand):

  1. Follow the Lemmy.world Rules - https://mastodon.world/about

  2. Be kind. No bullying, harassment, racism, sexism etc. against other users.

  3. No Spam, illegal content, or NSFW content.

  4. Please stay on topic, adjacent topics (e.g. software) are fine if they are strongly relevant to technology hardware. Another example would be business news for hardware-focused companies.

  5. Please try and post original sources when possible (as opposed to summaries).

  6. If posting an archived version of the article, please include a URL link to the original article in the body of the post.


Some other hardware communities across Lemmy:

Icon by "icon lauk" under CC BY 3.0

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] supernicepojo@lemmy.world 25 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

Single thread performance is not really a good metric for what this proc is designed for. There are few, if any, server designed softwares that would even need to test single-thread.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

It's still a desktop CPU, there are people who will want to play games on it when they aren't compiling code or rendering videos.

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Isn't it a "workstation" CPU rather than a "desktop"? Afaik it's aimed at productivity software, not games

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

Correct, it's still based on their epyc chips and is more for workstation duty than for a desktop.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)