this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
813 points (96.5% liked)

Technology

72360 readers
3264 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

'Kids Online Safety Act' will deliberately target trans content, senator admits.::undefined

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] randon31415@lemmy.world 80 points 2 years ago (30 children)

"The bill – endorsed by president Joe Biden..."

Why in the world would Biden support this Heritage foundation garbage?

[–] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 15 points 2 years ago (21 children)

Are you starting to see the cracks in the foundation? Are you starting to see how the game is played?

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 54 points 2 years ago (8 children)

This is actually a fantastic example of typical politics, but not in the way you're imagining. It's a classic poison pill. Write a bill with something good (protecting children's privacy online, which I think we'd all agree is good) and then put something unpalatable into it (transphobia and homophobia).

Someone votes for it, "Why do you hate LGBT people?" Someone votes against it, "Why don't you want children to have stronger privacy laws on the Internet?"

It's exhausting and a lose-lose. That said, I prefer if they don't vote for it and take heat for "being anti privacy". You don't negotiate with people's rights.

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Is it protecting children? Claims need evidence and rules need tests. Until we do that its fear-based, exploitable control for the sake of control.

[–] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 23 points 2 years ago

Government doesn't run on the scientific method, sadly.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Yeah that's the problem with legislation like this. You'll have proponents claim it protects children without actually explaining how.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)