this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2025
198 points (96.7% liked)

Fuck Cars

13491 readers
1201 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (12 children)

The Acela trains are far from being on par with French TGV, German ICE, or Japanese Shinkansen.

For a European, this is just a medium speed train.

[–] eligibly@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago (11 children)

As the comment you've replied to says, they are limited by the line speed and their design, and design speed, is effectively the same as the latest TGV.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (10 children)

TGVs at "normal speed" go at 320km/h or 200MPH. They can go up to 350MPH.

The Acela with its 160MPH top speed does not come close.

[–] eligibly@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You're not understanding the difference between the line speed and the train's design speed. The train is capable of comparable speeds, significantly higher than the track speed

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

It is not. The technical top speed of the Acela II is less than 190MPH due to technical restrictions, and it has less engine units than a TGV.

[–] hildegarde@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 month ago

From the comment that started this thread:

They could go the same speed with better infrastructure.

No, we all understood this the entire time.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)