131
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

I really can’t decide if I agree or not. Only had a chance to play 4 hours or so. My main impression so far is the menus are clunky and I hate how reliant travel is on the menu system. Doesn’t feel like I’m actually piloting anything

[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yea that’s my main problem so far, I don’t understand how NMS and space engineers both allow seamless travel from space to atmosphere but this major studio game forces me to open up the map and select land. Hopefully a mod fixes it because this is pretty atrocious for $70

[-] Skiptrace@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

It's an engine limitation. The Engine that Bethesda holds onto with an iron fist is what hampers their games.

However, the opposite side of the coin is, that it makes them super easy to modify, so people can make their own additions. Because Starfield is using the same engine as Skyrim and Fallout 4.

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I don't know if a better, modded flight system would be possible really. That looks like something so ingrained into the foundation of Starfield it would have had to be changed during production

[-] c0c0c0@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

This is why I cut them slack. I'd rather have the clunky mechanics than lose the vibrant modding platform.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
131 points (93.4% liked)

Starfield

2850 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to the Starfield community on Lemmy.zip!

Helpful links:

Spoiler policy:

Post & comment spoiler syntax:

<spoiler here>

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS