55
submitted 1 year ago by ono@lemmy.ca to c/science@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 year ago

Good article. Cochrane has its place but also has its issues. I like the phrase mentioned in the article "methodological fetishism" to describe their style.

[-] marco@beehaw.org 18 points 1 year ago

The bigger issue for me is the anti-science stance so many are pushing/following now, but whenever one study comes out reinforcing what they already wanted to believe they pounce on it. That's not how the scientific consensus works and that "methodological fetishism" fed right into it. We still need experts' help to understand what's significant.

[-] BearWolf 1 points 1 year ago

Bow to the experts and follow the science.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
55 points (100.0% liked)

Science

13006 readers
4 users here now

Studies, research findings, and interesting tidbits from the ever-expanding scientific world.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS