this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
1060 points (99.3% liked)

Firefox

20324 readers
218 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.


Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner


Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1376783

Thought I'd never see the day when Firefox would match Chrome on Speedometer.

There's also a few other benchmarks got a sizable boost. https://arewefastyet.com/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Morphior@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I have been using Firefox for basically as long as I can remember and I love it. However, there's one website that I go to Chromium for: GeoGuessr/Google Street View. For some reason it's unbelievably slow and sluggish in Firefox whereas it works normally in Chromium. Why could this be? To be clear, it's only the Street View part (and moving/panning/zooming) that's slow on GeoGuessr.

[–] blueson@feddit.nu 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

It wouldn't surprise me if the implementation has bias towards Chromium based browsers as both street view and Chromium are from Google.

[–] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They were literally caught artificially slowing down page loads and responsiveness on non-chrome browsers a while back.

[–] Raymonf@lemmy.uhhoh.com 1 points 2 years ago

Do you mean the time when YouTube's UI was built using a pre-standardized version of the Shadow DOM API, and had to polyfill it in Firefox? If so, that was tech debt, not artificially slowing down page loads for Firefox on purpose. It was a tradeoff that let non-Chrome users use YouTube until they finally upgraded a year or two later.

If that's not it, I'd love to see what you're referring to.

load more comments (3 replies)