this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
444 points (100.0% liked)

196

17981 readers
1485 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vanderbilt@beehaw.org 9 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Bluesky is pretty good, and you’re already on Lemmy so why not leave that cesspool?

[–] donuts@kbin.social 40 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Meh, to me BlueSky is really just the dude who made Twitter deciding he wanted to try making Mastodon too.

Don't get me wrong, it's certainly better than "X" at this point, but I prefer Mastodon and the Fediverse in every way. (Features, community, population, etc). If BlueSky was compatible with ActivityPub then it'd be easy to recommend, but it seems unlikely for now at least.

[–] atocci@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

ActivityPub is fine, I don't get why we needed a new standard for BlueSky.

[–] lilithanne@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well, bluesky went and used a separate protocol from AP which makes it mastodon and akkoma incompatible which is a bummer, also not sure if bluesky supports CW, which can come in handy a lot of times

[–] atocci@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

That's what I mean, why did they need to create the AT Protocol when ActivityPub had been around for almost 4 years by the time Bluesky was founded?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)