this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
45 points (97.9% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

5952 readers
31 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EnsignRedshirt@hexbear.net 37 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The only categorical difference between a child’s painting and a professional illustration is that the latter has value as a commodity. If that’s how art is being defined here then we can dismiss this opinion as deeply unserious.

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Exactly. Kids are absolutely making art. Ask the parents how it makes them feel when their child hands them a drawing of the two of them doing something nice. My parents saved everything and they treasure those memories.

[–] EnsignRedshirt@hexbear.net 15 points 2 years ago

I just don’t even know how you would argue that they aren’t making art. What purer form of artistic endeavor could you name than a child being creative for its own sake? Things like technical skill, novelty, complexity, etc. are qualities that art has, but they have nothing to do with the definition itself. If a child creates something with artistic intent, that’s art. Arguing otherwise is navel-gazing prescriptivism, the same basic argument as Roman statue fetishism and just as tedious.

load more comments (1 replies)