this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
210 points (98.2% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

5952 readers
22 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children)

Well, it's mostly private surveillance so it's ok. Muh property rights and all that.

Thing bad when gubment does it. Thing good when corporation does it!

[–] Thordros@hexbear.net 14 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Well, it's mostly private surveillance so it's ok. Muh property rights and all that.

Incidentally, they freely provide that footage to the government if asked.

[–] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Not entirely, its usually seen as a massive liability, so many corporations and business are hostile to investigators or requests for footage, especially if the crime or incident doesn't relate the company. Most footage has to be seized through warrants or subpoenas.

[–] SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 years ago

I will say I work in a very dangerous or crime-heavy location, so we have to deal with cops a LOT. An obscene amount. There is a rather arduous process involved... store management needs to be there to grant access, a warrant is required, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)