20
Any news on Sublinks?
(discuss.online)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
20 points (100.0% liked)
Sublinks
300 readers
1 users here now
Donations
About
Sublinks, crafted using Java Spring Boot, stands as a state-of-the-art link aggregation and microblogging platform, reminiscent yet advanced compared to Lemmy & Kbin.
It features a Lemmy compatible API, allowing for seamless integration and migration for existing Lemmy users.
Unique to Sublinks are its enhanced moderation tools, tailored to provide a safe and manageable online community space.
Embracing the fediverse, it supports the ActivityPub protocol, enabling interoperability with a wide range of social platforms.
Sublinks is not just a platform; it’s a community-centric ecosystem, prioritizing user experience, content authenticity, and networked social interaction.
See:
Rules
- Follow rules of discuss.online
- Keep topics related to Sublinks
- For support use !sublinks_support@discuss.online
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
You can have a look at the roadmap: https://github.com/orgs/sublinks/projects/1/views/6
I’m sorry but that also doesn’t make sense. This is what I see.
Please can someone just give a straightforward English update? It doesn’t have to be detailed just enough so I don’t give up.
The other issues are on the right:
Thank you for trying to help, I don’t know what 80% of that means or how it relates to an update.
I just don’t understand why there isn’t a simple straightforward update in plain English
The English translation is "they're still working on reaching feature parity with Lemmy".
Developing a platform like this is a lot of work and very technical. Communicating every step of the way to a non-technical audience would double the workload.
There's basically two types of projects: Those that are dead, and those that are not. The fact that it is still getting commits means it's in the latter category, and it'll be done when it's done.
It can be frustrating waiting for open source projects to progress, but part of what makes open source great is that you don't need to rush half-baked features in order to meet some corporate roadmap. :)
That may well be true, but sounds like general exposition. I should point out that I’m not requesting a detailed roadmap and I don’t think anyone requested communication every step of the way.
The initial announcement made it sound like launch was imminent. That was months ago and so I imagined (perhaps foolishly) there would be some sort of update posted and hoped it would be in plain English.
Edit: In fact at the time of the launch jgrim said to stay tuned for regular updates!