this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
6 points (57.5% liked)

World News

36907 readers
349 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 9 points 1 year ago (26 children)

Shouldn't have invested in Russia. It was a bad business decision and you have to live with the consequences. The article is written as if the West is to blame for the sanctions. The facts are very clear: Russia invaded.

The writing was on the wall for years. Ukraine warned the EU, the Baltics had been concerned for years, and these companies idiotically increased their investments in Russia. At the latest once the war started it should've been clear that exiting Russia was going to be necessary, if not forced.

Want to blame somebody? Blame Russia.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (22 children)

aww somebody doesn't understand how capitalism works

[–] Atomic@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (21 children)

What part of his comment makes you think he doesn't understand what he's talking about?

He's very clearly stating to the companies. Don't blame the West for sanctioning Russia, blame Russia for engadging in activities that warrants sanctioning, and blame yourself for increasing your investments when the writing was on the wall since at least 2014

[–] Pili@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 year ago

blame Russia for engadging in activities that warrants sanctioning

But why though? Russia had just observed 20 years of invasion of Afghanistan by the USA, with absolutely no divestment and no sanction as a result. So the logical conclusion should be that invasion doesn't warrant sanctioning. Why would Russia be a special case? If everyone can invade everyone, it would make sense that Russia understands that it also applies to them.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)